Why I Am A Conservative

1st, let us begin with the dictionary definition of conserve: to preserve from becoming damaged, lost or wasted; to save preserve, or maintain. In politics, a conservative is defined as an individual tending to conserve or maintain established traditions or institutions.

These days let us ask a leading question. Is it worthwhile to conserve or be a conservative? George Santayana, Spanish-American poet and teacher of philosophy at Harvard University, wrote in his book Cause in Widespread Sense: "Those who can't bear in mind the past are condemned to repeat it."

I am a youngster of the Excellent Depression - oldest youngster of a mother set adrift in that financial disaster with Three children. 1 week we lived on a peck of dried peas - morning, noon and evening - which my mother, in Excellent humiliation, obtained from the government surplus food depot.

I mention these painful, private memories so that you will realize I am not unmindful of the hardships of poverty and circumstance, or the role of government in mitigating disaster.

I cast my 1st vote for Franklin Delano Roosevelt - believing then, and nonetheless right now - that government has a responsibility to "prime the pump" in Excellent emergencies.

Sadly, when Democrats realized the vote - acquiring energy of free of charge, social services, they would not return to the requirement of person responsibilities. In 1951, while lunching at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., President Truman and his press secretary came in and took stools at the bar subsequent to our table. Right after sandwich and soup, the president turned and mentioned hello to my host. With this we engaged the president in conversation.

That morning, a headline on the front page of the "Washington Article" was -- "Inflation Hits 3 %." None of us in the group had ever heard of inflation. So I mentioned, "Mr. President, excuse my ignorance, but what is inflation?

Mr. Truman smiled and replied, "Do not apologize. I was asked that similar question at the cabinet meeting this morning. I explained it was such as a hunter stung by a bee -- and here he told a locker-room joke, the gist of which was the hunter's wish for a salve that would get rid of the sting but leave the swelling.

I laughed, but I learned he was deliberately pumping up inflation for political acquire - by running the printing presses overtime at the Bureau of Engraving.

Truman already had confiscated the real money in the Social Security Insurance Fund to enable pay for Globe War II, replacing the insurance reserve with I.O.U s. Therefore, the hedge against old age retirement ceased becoming insurance and became a "trust." Some of you may possibly keep in mind the liberal argument: "There is absolutely nothing to be concerned around. We owe it to ourselves."

I became alarmed, due to the fact Widespread sense told me that Social Security, and even the nation, would go bankrupt if inflation - at 1 %, or whatever - continued indefinitely. That's when I became a conservative.

When Social Security approached its 1st brief-fall in the early sixties, I wrote a column warning around the impending crisis. The quantity of angry response by readers, which includes some close buddies who really should have grasped the details, astonished me. I was referred to as irresponsible for suggesting that Social Security was in difficulty.

Regrettably, the Washington politicians fessed up a year later and raised the employee/employer Social Security taxes for the 1st time. Such increases have occurred periodically just about every simply because. A different is necessary these days, as is Medicare and Medicaid.

The important trouble is that operating-and-saving Americans these days ought to cough up to government - federal, state, and local - at least a third of what they earn. I am a student of history, and I have realized that all prior civilizations have collapsed when roughly 40 % of the fruits of producers go to enable non-producers - government functionaries becoming the largest non-productive shoppers.

We are closer to the edge than our politicians including to admit. In our time, the Soviet Union slipped over the edge. The Communist Manifesto - "to each according to want, from each according to ability" - has a Fantastic, compassionate ring. But socialism often has been a nation-killer, and liberalism is absolutely nothing a lot more than slow-motion socialism.

The United States national debt is 5 and 1/2 trillion cash. Interest on this debt takes the top 35 % of federal taxes. Social services that the borrowed cash supplied has been consumed and forgotten.

If we balanced the federal price range subsequent year, and each and every year forever, we would in no way escape the 35 % overburden on our federal revenue devoid of repudiating the debt, or confiscating your and my savings by drastic devaluation of our cash.

Do not laugh! President Nixon did it overnight in a smaller way. Mexico and Russia did it final year major time. Inflation does it additional slowly, but just as certainly. How substantially did you pay for your final residence or car that 20 years ago price 1-fourth as a lot?

We should move on from balancing the spending budget and begin operating earnestly toward decreasing the national debt. It\'s the economy, stupid.

Right after the economy, the principal difficulties plaguing the nation center about the liberal dissipation of established traditions and institutions.

We have destroyed the loved ones and the work ethic with no-questions-asked welfare, encouragement of out-of-wedlock teen-age pregnancies with free of charge condoms in school and welfare Right after delivery that rewards the disappearance of impregnators We have dumbed down education with the hope of keeping youngsters in school - but, nonetheless, the drop-out rate in inner-city schools is 45 % and unemployment of young, black males is 55 %. A lost generation.

Pornography and gutter language is Widespread on prime- time tv. Teen-age drug addiction is soaring. Street violence is commonplace.

liberals laugh at morality, loved ones values, religious faith, hard work, high educational standards, courtesy, patriotism, chaste sexual conduct, person responsibility, pre-marital abstinence, polite language.

To conserve, 1 has to be smart adequate to know what to preserve and maintain from 10,000 years of civilization, so we Do not preserve repeating grievous errors. Our nation, our culture, our civilization depends on conservatism - either to save what is Fantastic and workable, or to rescue us from anarchy when the nation goes belly up.

I close by recommending the "Serenity Prayer" delivered at the height of the Wonderful Depression - by Reinhold Niebuhr, the renowned American clergyman:

"God grant us the courage to alter items we can, accept the issues we can't, and the wisdom to know the distinction."

September 25, 1996

Click here to see this write-up on Lindsey Williams's site

Lindsey Williams is a Sun columnist who can be contacted at:

LinWms@earthlink.net or LinWms@lindseywilliams.org

Web site: http://www.lindseywilliams.org with over a thousand of Lin's Editorial & At Large articles written over 40 years.

Also featured in its entirety is Lin's groundbreaking book "Boldly Onward," that critically analyzes and develops theories around the original Spanish explorers of America. (fully indexed/searchable)

Write-up Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Lindsey_Williams
http://EzineArticles.com/?Why-I-Am-A-Conservative&id=484617

Public Vs Private Sector Or Liberal Vs Conservative

Public and private sector. Liberal and Conservative. Left and correct. What's it indicates and why do we care?

There are Two schools of believed competing for recognition rights now on a scale not observed decades. One school, that of the left, liberal mindset, supports the concept of government running all elements of our lives. From well being care choices, to kind of food we eat, to which liberties we are allowed to physical exercise, individuals of the left seek to control as considerably of individual freedom as doable.

California, extended a bastion of liberal influence, has several examples of this. In some cities, legislators have created it illegal to smoke even in your private residence. Animals and plants take priority over people today as in Central California create growers. San Francisco is contemplating an ordinance to outlaw all sales of animals, except fish, in the city since they have too a lot of animals in the shelters. One Democrat sought to pass a law in the state outlawing spanking of youngsters by their parents.

The other school of believed is that of the conservative. The conservative seeks to live his life and relishes his individuality and the liberty that comes with it. He seeks restricted government regulation, reveres Deity, and offers to other people the very same rights and responsibilities so lengthy as they do not interfere with the workout of those rights. In other words, the conservative champions the rights of people today and people to select for themselves what's greatest, not a group of politicians or elites who want to determine for them.

A lot of South and what is referred to as "fly-over nation" by liberals is conservative oriented. conservatives subscribe to the practices and beliefs of the Founding Fathers of the County, restricted government, private property, free markets and individual liberty. liberals subscribe to the opposite of all these issues. Folks are grouped by gender, race, sex, origin and much more for the objective of generating them victims. liberals

Commonsense Solutions - Commonsense Conservative Views

In numerous methods, we appear to have lost our way in the globe. So numerous of our issues had been foreseen, that the directions in which we are headed appear so backwards it is tough to know how we got here. Some conservative views to ponder:

Oil - Because the Presidency of Jimmy Carter, we have as a country worried about our dependency on foreign oil. Each parties have promised options, and Each have failed us. We sit on large oil reserves that would present desperately necessary jobs for unemployed Americans, and deprive the men and women who hate us of our petrodollars. But we continue to make it tougher and tougher to create our very own oil, and invest millions of taxpayer dollars on unproven green technologies. Does this make sense?

Healthcare - The International Monetary Fund warned the country of Greece that they ought to get out of the healthcare organization in order to rescue their country from bankruptcy. Our neighbor to the north, Canada, has attempted universal healthcare with disastrous outcomes for their country and the health of its men and women. Massachusetts has seen healthcare fees soar out of sight making use of the very same healthcare proposals that have been passed into law by the Obama administration. And do I ought to remind you of what TennCare has carried out to our state spending budget? In poll following poll the American folks have expressed their dissatisfaction with the new healthcare strategy, But it looms over us, slowly becoming implemented. Why?

Our Border - Because the administration of Ronald Reagan, the American folks have asked for a secure border. Because 9/11, it has clearly been an issue of national security, and our Constitution demands it! But the borders stay open, and the American taxpayer spends million and billions of dollars offering healthcare, prison space, education facilities (and on and on) for the illegals amongst us. Now as a outcome of our inattention to this issue, we see a raging drug war that is spilling over the border into American towns and cities. Why wasn't some thing performed lengthy ago, and why are we nonetheless performing absolutely nothing?

The Deficit - For years, politicians have worried about our national debt, and promised to rein in spending. But with a national debt approaching 13 TRILLION, every single week we witness some new government plan, financed with borrowed dollars launched to develop the government. President Obama decries the no cost spending methods of George Bush, But his 1st price range was practically Three instances the highest spending of the Bush years. When nearly 50 cents of each dollar is borrowed, why are we spending so considerably?

How tough would it be to drop the barriers to creating our personal oil reserves, enable health insurance organizations to compete for our enterprise all across the country, secure the border, and cease spending cash we don\'t have? We could do all those issues if we only had politicians with conservative views that would listen to us. It isn't that these issues are insurmountable. It is that effective influences in Washington DC have a vested interest in keeping items the way they are...and they use our cash to offer those fantastic TV commercials to make us believe they care...

I, in my commonsense conservative views, feel it is time we voted for the citizen legislator instead of the eggheads from Harvard and Yale with no expertise, only academic theories. We will need people today who know how to solve issues, not raise cash from unique interests, regardless of whether those interest are unions or companies. We want situation solvers from everyday walks of life, and not the identical old political households with their cautiously groomed heirs to their hereditary offices. We stand at a crossroads that will establish the future of our country. We have far more details at our fingertips than any generation just before us ever had. If it is correct that we get the politicians we deserve, I would phrase it a small differently. What do the future generations, our youngsters and grandchildren deserve? It is now their future we are mortgaging. Decide on wisely when you vote. THEIR future depends on it!

DSHolman is an entrepreneur and loved ones man involved in politics locally and all through the nation. He holds to his conservative views and has an avid interest in the conservative news.

Post Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Donald_Holman
http://EzineArticles.com/?Commonsense-Options---Commonsense-Conservative-Views&id=5258489

Sean Hannity's "Conservative Victory"

Sean Hannity delivers an additional explosive book about the dangers of liberalism and the require of Conservative Victory. He goes into fantastic detail about the danger Obama's pals, programs and relationships pose for those who think in freedom and smaller government.

His initial chapter goes into Obama's history and how he was raised. He was raised up by his mother and Grandparents who had numerous Marxist views. These views shaped him into what he is these days and ready him for his life in liberal politics.

Sean goes into fantastic detail about the radical pals and associations that he either had or has today in the course of his political profession. The book goes into wonderful detail about how these buddies have influenced his behavior as a Senator and President of the United States.

Sean also goes into detail about his socialist views and policies. These policies have created the nation weaker and emboldened our enemies as time progresses. These policies have failed the American Men and women as they have created him and his buddies richer. These funds are carried on the backs of the American Tax payer and the future tax payers not but with us.

His appeasement mentality has exposed him for who is genuinely is. President Obama is a coward who would trie to appease those who hate us even though shunning those who would ally with us. This has created for a weak America and risky globe.

Sean also expresses his views as a "Reagan Conservative." It shows up in the course of the book and he devotes an total chapter in the book. He believes this variety of conservatism which entails a smaller government, far more freedoms and person responsibility will bring this nation back to its prosperous approaches. He also goes into detail about a new "Contract with America" that would hold those in workplace accountable to the Men and women they represent. It would also lessen the the influence the government would have in the lives of the American People today.

Sean Hannity goes into excellent detail about how the Republican party had lost its way. The outcome was the loss of the majorities that they carried in each houses of Congress. It goes into detail on what the Republicans ought to do to win the heart of the conservative base and to take back the House and Senate.

For Wonderful Political Book critiques please check out http://www.politicalbookreview.com

Write-up Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=Thomas_Oen
http://EzineArticles.com/?Sean-Hannitys-Conservative-Victory&id=4192032

Conservative Vs Progressive Governments

In a current interview, Thomas Sowell, an American economist and author and Senior Fellow at Hoover Institute, who turned 80 this year discussed his new book and suggestions in an interview. In his new book, Dismantling America: and other controversial essays. and in the interview he lays out his philosophy of government, which is the Conservative position of laissez-faire (significantly much less regulation) of financial activity and of government intervention of social values.

I've often admired Professor Sowell and have enjoyed numerous of his books, especially in the region of economics and his understanding of absolutely free trade which is based on no cost association and exchange. But as a 'former' Conservative for over 30 yrs I've come to the realization that the major distinction in between Progressives and conservatives is what they want the federal government to regulate. Pros want to regulate financial activity to create social outcomes of collective equality, justice and peace, though Cons favor to leave financial activity to a freer and much less regulated model but on the other hand favor to intervene into societal values with federal powers. My assertion is that social values and financial values work in tandem and responsd to open markets in equivalent approaches, and that to have a wholesome economy and 'values' wealthy society is to have significantly much less regulations and additional freedom of association and transaction.

The framers of our constitution in truth grappled with this and in their brilliance came up with a divided government that enumerate precise powers of the federal government which had been 'negative' concerning liberty and left all else to the States which may well be either 'negative' or 'positive' liberty, but warned against the latter. Negative Liberty is like Adam's relationship with God in the garden, "All else you are totally free to do, but remain away from this tree" vs God's relationship with the Israelites via Mosaic Law, "these 613 laws you Need to carry out to qualify". JS Mill place Negative Liberty this way in his Harm Principle, "That the only objective for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to stop harm to other people. " As Jefferson stated, "The very best government is the One that governs least." Doesn\'t it make sense that if you or I can barely (a least we feel) regulate our personal houses, then why would we consider far more power in Washington, DC would permit for superior regulatory outcomes.

Also, with the exceptional personalities, talents and physical demands from house to house, wouldn't it make sense that how you govern successfully may well be unique than how I would in my house? Managing from 30,000 feet is considerably much less helpful and may be dangerous and counter productive versus managing close and on the ground. The framers understood this, and looked to a number of sources and historical events to conclude that 'macro government' Need to be negative in its application of law (like the garden) but that States and their local precincts may possibly experiment in positive liberty. So problems like marriage, drugs, land rights, banking, and so forth, they left to the States to make a decision. The essence of the Constitution was to limit power and maximize liberty, but to let the Federal Government to step in when those liberties have been violated, the powers left to the States depending upon each and every State's Charter or Constitution allowed for them to 'dabble' in positive liberty to regulate particular values - but forewarned them to proceed at their very own peril.

Christopher M. Mahon
http://www.ambidextrouscivicdiscourse.com

The Ambidextrous Civic Discourse web site is a put exactly where you can locate data about financial, philosophical and political problems that challenge those on the 'right' or the 'left'. Here you can uncover classics on the subjects said above that contrast differences like Keynesian vs Classical Economics or the function of government - Negative vs Positive Rights. You\'ll also be in a position to gain a far better understanding of the Two huge political parties and the progressive and conservative movements. We also have a study plan, ACD Studies that enables for open discussion on it\'s weblog to read and exchange suggestions with other members. We hope you enjoy our internet site and invite input on how we can increase it.

Write-up Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=Christopher_Mahon
http://EzineArticles.com/?Conservative-Vs-Progressive-Governments&id=5331111