Do you love FREE information?

Head over to mass-ebooks.com if you have a passion for free information downloads. Here you will find great PDF downloads on a variety of subjects - Health, fitness, romance, money, hypnosis, self-help, etc... you name it.

Grab your free 'how to' downloads today.

Oh, and be sure to add my blog, www.TiltRight.com, to your favorites and check back often.



Monday, January 10, 2011

The Conservative Pledge

I've read the Republicans "A Pledge to America." I such as and endorse most what they have to say, but they didn't address numerous of the complaints of accurate conservatives, of those marching in the streets, and of those who are searching at D.C. and asking, "who are those guys?" Had been I at the helm of the wayward ship named "Congress" this would be my pledge to those who've finally awakened to what's happening, and what's not happening, in the capitol.

1) Decrease congressional salaries to a mid-Clinton level, when the fantastic "let's get the votes to preserve us in workplace," started. When Democrats pushed for, and Republicans overlooked, the destruction of Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac and consequently the economy. Exactly where did the idea commence that One need to be rewarded for carrying out a damn poor job. I believed this was a totally free business society, which rewarded those who excel, not those who fail. Government really should be no various.

2) Eliminate the "crowns" of Congress. Get rid of all elements of the royalty, the elite couple of, who Congress have turn out to be. Retirement need to be based on financial reality, basically as any other PRIVATE market (who've not been beaten up by unions) would compute. What you've paid into retirement is what you pull out right after very same. The similar goes for perks, which includes wellness care. Losing this investment/return idea is what has broken cities, counties, states, and the Fed.

3) Lower the size of government by 20% in the subsequent 5 years. And, no, you can't dump additional than a half million Men and women out on their ears. (The federal government employs roughly 2 million federal workers plus 700,000 Postal workers and hires hundreds of thousands each and every year to replace civil service workers that transfer to other federal government jobs, retire, or leave for other causes. Common annual salary for full-time federal government jobs now exceeds $79,197. The U.S. Government is the largest employer in the United States, hiring about 2.0 % of the country's work force and the workforce is expanding drastically due to wellness care reform, in-sourcing, and quite a few new regulatory programs. Federal government jobs can be observed in every single state and large metropolitan location, which includes overseas in over 200 nations. The Typical annual federal workers compensation, like pay plus rewards, now exceeds $119,982 compared to simply $59,909 for the private sector according to the United States Bureau of Financial Analysis)

So what's the answer? It\'s easy, Provide a tax incentive to the private sector. If a market hires a severed government employee then they obtain a 200% write off on the price of that employee for a 5 year period (and no severed employee could be severed to hire identical), a 150% cost for the right after 5 years, and the typical 100% price thereafter. A 200% cost would, in impact, make that employee virtually no cost to that market for that five year period, and industry would flock to hire severed government workers...even although most would have to be retrained to truly work. So let's see: 540,000 workers at an Typical price of $120,000 equals an annual savings of 64.8 billion a year. That's a start.

4) Supply tax incentives to firms who repatriate jobs that Were lost overseas. A repatriated job could be expensed at 150% of price, producing Mr. Singh in India not look so excellent to Microsoft and other firms.

five) Limit political campaign contributions, even if it takes a Constitutional Amendment to overcome the Absolutely free Speech situation. Folks could not donate a lot more than $100.00 and organizations--public, private, charitable, and so forth.-or any other group, especially unions, a lot more than $1,000. When political campaign fees attain the stratosphere, over One hundred million cash, It is turn into obscene and beyond Average sense. Violation of that provision need to be a felony, with a minimum of a year served, no exemptions or exceptions.

6) Ban lobbyists from public buildings. If a representative or senator desires to be bought by a cause or business, then let him travel outside the sanctity of his public supplied and paid for workplace, Exactly where there's a slight likelihood he'll be observed in the light of day. Of course, a limit of campaign contribution would impact the very same issue.

7) The so known as pledge calls for a 3 day review of legislation just before It\'s voted upon. Most of our legislators have confirmed they can't read, substantially much less read a 2,500 word bill, so Three days, or Three months, wouldn't do the trick. The amount ought to Had been 30 days, right after a printed version is created readily available to any interested party (those of us who can and are prepared to read), preferably on the net, unless It\'s emergency funding for a disaster or military objective. That would Provide the electorate a slight possibility at raising hell.

8) Repeal Obama care and go following the situation (funds alone not becoming the remedy), fraud by medical doctors and hospitals and other well being care companies, and run-away liability settlements in the courts. Liability ought to be for real fees and loss of cash, and punitive damages, restricted to 20% of the real damage judgment, and then only in the case of extreme negligence...when a surgeon cuts off the incorrect limb, or a wellness care provider plugs the incorrect med into an I.V., and so forth. Catastrophic care really should be offered in some form, as ought to pre-current conditions, so extended as the responsible party's resources are exhausted.

9) The "pledge" did address the 10th Amendment, in a loose style. Part of the original Bill of Rights, the 10th states, extremely basically, and elegantly to my way of thinking:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the Folks.

Speak is affordable. The pledge really should Were precise. An instant study will be undertaken to evaluate every single Element, each and every department, every single nook and cranny of the federal morass to see if it exceeds those powers granted in the constitution. And those excess powers, and employees resulting there from, would right away target Exactly where cuts could be produced: see 3) above.

When did we start to believe that we ought to send dollars from every single and each tax paying Family members in America, all the way to Washington D.C., have them take a 30 or 40% cut there from, and redistribute it back to us in the form of "grants" or "services." Sorry, but as the forefathers foresaw, the "States respectively, or to the Folks," was a reservation that really should be respected and adhered to PERIOD. Ignoring that brilliant idea, tweeking it and twisting it to fit some special interest, is Exactly where we started to go so seriously astray.

10) No law really should be longer than the Constitution (then possibly we could read and fully grasp it), and at least 30 days of every single Congressional year must be devoted to REMOVING current laws that Were judged obsolete or ineffective. Let's see, have some errors been created in the past? That's a start.

L. J. Martin has written 20 novels, 2 non-fiction functions, and is published in a quantity of periodicals. Just before being a writer he was a real estate broker, specializing in farms, ranches, and improvement properties and promoting internationally. He was also a licensed appraiser and contractor. Born and raised in the oil and ag town of Bakersfield, CA, and hailing from a lengthy line of Okies, Missourians, and Texans, he's traveled extensively for each work and pleasure. He's married to an internationally published romantic suspense and historical romance author, and now lives in Montana.

From The Pea Patch is One nation boy's opinion of, and reporting of, what's happening outside, inside, and to our nation. He considers himself an financial conservative and social liberal in that he is his brother's keeper so lengthy as his brother (in the broad sense of humanity) is legitimately in need to have, and not One of those far-too-several on the government tit for greed, not require. His religion is that of the high lonely and his cathedrals are the alpine, above the timber line, and the monuments to and concepts of Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln. He believes in God, Nation, and Family members, and in the no cost business enterprise method which has kept the U.S.A. as the go-to nation in the globe...and he damn sure desires to maintain it that way, and feels the responsibility to do so for his young children and grandchildren, and yours. Heartfelt, he thinks compassion and political correctness have wormed their way into our society, and the psyche of our citizens, far too deeply, and It\'s time we paid heed to Average sense for the correct Typical fantastic.

For additional, check out: http://fromthepeapatch.com

Post Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=L._J._Martin
http://EzineArticles.com/?The-Conservative-Pledge&id=5168194

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Book Review - Current Events, Conservative Future, by G A Freiman

Fighting Worry with Information and Vision

Now Americans are faced with unknowns, the uncertainty of the economy, the threat of terrorist attacks, and a Worry for our nation's leadership and respect about the globe. In his book "Existing Events, Conservative Outcomes" G. A. Freiman talks around, and analyzes these fears in light of Existing events with predictions for America's future. He makes use of Understanding he has received in the form of a visionary practice, meditation and reflection, as properly as by way of life experiences and his own educational opportunities.

Freiman has an innate passion and enjoy for America. This is reflected in his writing. His writing is deeply spiritual, expressive, and logical. Freiman's sets out to enable the reader form honest opinions on politics, religion, and social problems. He hypothesizes on political correctness, the threat of terrorism, the influence of global warming, poverty, abortion, and euthanasia with clarity, perception and forthrightness.

I observed the questions that accompanied every single concern believed provoking, meaningful, and practical. The reader was also shown action actions might take to have an effect on the future, in very own areas, the political arena, or on social problems. Freiman's predictions on American culture offer crucial insight and are worthy of consideration even for the skeptic of physic phenomena.

While the book's title may possibly limit its audience, this is a book for liberal and conservative a enjoy. It is a call for positive participation and a dedication to generate a far better future for our youngsters and for those generations nonetheless to come.

Frieman's practice draws the reader into a very own assessment of their faith. He assists them take a fresh appear at the meaning of life, at root causes, into global thinking. He invites the reader to consider their relationship with God, His creation, and with all of humanity. "Present Events, Conservative Outcomes" is extremely perceptive, entertaining, and believed provoking.

Xulon Press

978-1604775990

As reviewed for Midwest Book Review.

Richard R. Blake, Christian Education Consultant, Book Store Owner

Write-up Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=Richard_R_Blake
http://EzineArticles.com/?Book-Review---Existing-Events,-Conservative-Future,-by-G-A-Freiman&id=1103610

Saturday, January 1, 2011

Three Venues For Conservative Grassroots Organization

No matter whether you are organizing for a campaign, a group or just an concern you care around, there are Three areas that it pays for conservatives to focus their time and efforts in order to have the best prospective effect. And every single area has diverse rewards, but also its very own challenges.

Organizing by precinct:

Organizing by precinct is far more geographically focused and as a outcome it can have a far more direct and higher prospective effect on a particular area. This is simply because the American political program is constructed about the precinct. Meaning that elections are held in political districts (school board, city council, county council, Congress) which are constructed on a diverse mixture of precincts, and if you are organized in the precincts you can effect an election - or an elected official who desires to run for re-election.

This also applies to the political parties, because the parties (for the exact same factors mentioned) are organized about precincts.

The bottom line is that great precinct organization offers you with good leverage.

Organizing in churches:

Organizing in churches permits you to work with individuals you\'re most likely already a lot more familiar with, and are most likely to have much more in prevalent with politically. It also has the benefit of involving individuals across several neighborhoods (which also signifies precincts), which can "sow the seeds" of activism in far more than one area.

Bear in mind the old saying: "hunt exactly where the ducks are".

On the internet organization:

On the web organization can exist on its very own or as a compliment to church and/or precinct organization, (ex. On the net "groups" through Yahoo, Google, Ning or Facebook; or On the web petitions and campaigns at AktNow.com - or a mixture). And when you organize On the net, you make it less complicated to share details with other people and for other people to discover you.

Exactly where to focus your time?

In order to decide exactly where you ought to focus your time and efforts, ask your self the following questions:

* What particularly do I want to influence or accomplish? Is it a lot more educational and/or concern associated, or is it far more political?

* Exactly where do I know the most folks who believe like I do, and who are prepared to assist? (Hunt exactly where the ducks are!)

Whichever kind of organization you strategy to focus on, Keep in mind that it all comes down to individuals. Politics is men and women.

You get sufficient individuals together with a widespread objective, and you've got grassroots organization. And grassroots organization leads to political influence...which leads to legislative and policy success.

Drew McKissick is a political strategist and former member of the Republican National Committee with over twenty years of encounter in grassroots politics. He writes a typical column offering analysis and commentary on present events. His site is accessible at DrewMcKissick.com. You can follow him on Twitter @DrewMcKissick

Write-up Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=Drew_McKissick
http://EzineArticles.com/?Three-Venues-For-Conservative-Grassroots-Organization&id=3712436

Saturday, December 25, 2010

Conservative Liberal - Why is One a Dirty Word?

The word liberal is utilised in a derogatory manner in quite a few political campaigns. Quite a few instances a candidate can paint a negative image of an opponent just by labeling them a "liberal"

On the other hand, conservative does not have the similar connotation. If a politician attempted to persuade his or her constituents to not vote for their opponent, labeling them "conservative" the opponent would additional than probably embrace that label.

Becoming in New York City, I in no way believed liberal was a dirty word, a word that you do not want to be linked with. In comparing the definitions of the Two words, I consider I am justified in feeling that way.

Note that I am speaking around the use of the word liberal or conservative when it comes to social problems.

Let's appear up the definition of liberal and conservative and see what we get.

Conservative initial.

I searched for "define conservative" and "definition conservative" in Google.

I got back some outcomes such as "having social or political views favoring conservatism" and "a member of a Conservative Party".

While that's fine, I was only interested in the definitions of the word. I knew conservative or liberal are each methods to lean politically.

Other outcomes did define the word, such as:

* Favoring conventional views and values; tending to oppose alter.
* One favoring conventional views and values.
* Conventional or restrained in style
* tending or disposed to preserve current views, conditions, or institutions

This tells a lot. Conservative, specifically in a social sense, is around sustaining the status quo. conservatives do not like alter.

Nowadays, it\'s time to appear up the word "Liberal."

* broad: displaying or characterized by broad-mindedness;
* having political or social views favoring reform and progress
* tolerant of alter; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition

OK, so there is the contrasting side of conservative.

Consider around this. If a buddy or a person you respect could describe you with either definition, which would you rather have mentioned around you?

That you are broad minded or narrow minded?
That you do not like alter or that you are tolerant of alter?
That you favor progress or you don\'t favor progress?
That you favor institutions or you are not bound by the past?

Alter is beneficial. Progress has given us points like - information that earth goes about the sun, undertaking away with burning people today at the stake, modern day science, electrical energy, airplanes, computers, the suitable of ladies to vote, and the abolishment of slavery.

Tradition is excellent too, but not when it stops progress or hurts a different person or interferes with their liberties or proper to pursue happiness.

If you just take the final 100 years or so, the conservative has been on the incorrect side of history. As an instance, you don\'t assume the Dixiecrats had been liberal do you?

When George Wallace, was campaigning to maintain racial segregation, was he running as a liberal or a conservative?

And when groups of folks band together to uphold items like "standard values" and "household values" and they endorse and promote policies that are based on exclusion instead of inclusion this is harmful for freedom and humanity.

conservatives will say items like "folks who oppose their conservative values hate America and oppose every thing that produced us beneficial." The precise opposite is accurate. If you don\'t strive to continuously make it far better and embrace progress then you remain in the past and stop understanding which is a thing that must in no way be accomplished.

For these causes the word Liberal ought to be worn as a badge of honor. An individual searching for a superior tomorrow thinking our ideal days are ahead of us, rather than clinging to yesterday mainly because that's much easier to do.

If you liked this post or want to read other people like it, I advocate going to http://www.dailyepost.com for additional posts and articles around political and social problems of these days.

Write-up Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=Ethan_Semmel
http://EzineArticles.com/?Conservative-Liberal---Why-is-One-a-Dirty-Word?&id=4351425

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Commonsense Solutions - Commonsense Conservative Views

In numerous methods, we appear to have lost our way in the globe. So numerous of our issues had been foreseen, that the directions in which we are headed appear so backwards it is tough to know how we got here. Some conservative views to ponder:

Oil - Because the Presidency of Jimmy Carter, we have as a country worried about our dependency on foreign oil. Each parties have promised options, and Each have failed us. We sit on large oil reserves that would present desperately necessary jobs for unemployed Americans, and deprive the men and women who hate us of our petrodollars. But we continue to make it tougher and tougher to create our very own oil, and invest millions of taxpayer dollars on unproven green technologies. Does this make sense?

Healthcare - The International Monetary Fund warned the country of Greece that they ought to get out of the healthcare organization in order to rescue their country from bankruptcy. Our neighbor to the north, Canada, has attempted universal healthcare with disastrous outcomes for their country and the health of its men and women. Massachusetts has seen healthcare fees soar out of sight making use of the very same healthcare proposals that have been passed into law by the Obama administration. And do I ought to remind you of what TennCare has carried out to our state spending budget? In poll following poll the American folks have expressed their dissatisfaction with the new healthcare strategy, But it looms over us, slowly becoming implemented. Why?

Our Border - Because the administration of Ronald Reagan, the American folks have asked for a secure border. Because 9/11, it has clearly been an issue of national security, and our Constitution demands it! But the borders stay open, and the American taxpayer spends million and billions of dollars offering healthcare, prison space, education facilities (and on and on) for the illegals amongst us. Now as a outcome of our inattention to this issue, we see a raging drug war that is spilling over the border into American towns and cities. Why wasn't some thing performed lengthy ago, and why are we nonetheless performing absolutely nothing?

The Deficit - For years, politicians have worried about our national debt, and promised to rein in spending. But with a national debt approaching 13 TRILLION, every single week we witness some new government plan, financed with borrowed dollars launched to develop the government. President Obama decries the no cost spending methods of George Bush, But his 1st price range was practically Three instances the highest spending of the Bush years. When nearly 50 cents of each dollar is borrowed, why are we spending so considerably?

How tough would it be to drop the barriers to creating our personal oil reserves, enable health insurance organizations to compete for our enterprise all across the country, secure the border, and cease spending cash we don\'t have? We could do all those issues if we only had politicians with conservative views that would listen to us. It isn't that these issues are insurmountable. It is that effective influences in Washington DC have a vested interest in keeping items the way they are...and they use our cash to offer those fantastic TV commercials to make us believe they care...

I, in my commonsense conservative views, feel it is time we voted for the citizen legislator instead of the eggheads from Harvard and Yale with no expertise, only academic theories. We will need people today who know how to solve issues, not raise cash from unique interests, regardless of whether those interest are unions or companies. We want situation solvers from everyday walks of life, and not the identical old political households with their cautiously groomed heirs to their hereditary offices. We stand at a crossroads that will establish the future of our country. We have far more details at our fingertips than any generation just before us ever had. If it is correct that we get the politicians we deserve, I would phrase it a small differently. What do the future generations, our youngsters and grandchildren deserve? It is now their future we are mortgaging. Decide on wisely when you vote. THEIR future depends on it!

DSHolman is an entrepreneur and loved ones man involved in politics locally and all through the nation. He holds to his conservative views and has an avid interest in the conservative news.

Post Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Donald_Holman
http://EzineArticles.com/?Commonsense-Options---Commonsense-Conservative-Views&id=5258489