Right Wing Conservative Rush Limbaugh - 20 Million Strong and Growing

Very first, Let me say: Kudos, Rush.

In case you are not conscious, there has been a concerted effort for years to get Appropriate-Wing Speak Show Host, Rush Limbaugh, off the air --- to quiet his voice. The most recent is a man claiming to be a Republican, Colin Powell.* He believes that Republicans need to quit listening to Rush.

Certainly, Powell jests. Rush is the cornerstone of Correct-Wing Politics. He has twenty million men and women who listen to him day right after day, month following month, year following year. I am one.

Why? There are other Speak show programs that are very good, other Correct-Wingers who Talk out on conservative problems over radio and tv. Yet Rush is unique. He has a way of "extracting that one diamond out of all the paste of all the verbiage." Rush's insight nonetheless amazes me, and that's why I listen. I don\'t usually agree with Rush, yet he does make me believe.

Rush is witty and smart, as well as entertaining. Details and info Rush provides us are accurate 98% of the time, according to many studies. Therefore, we can believe what Rush says. Much more than that, he has a particular gift of spotting fallacies and even lies on the liberal side of politics, some thing I personally discover no other Speak show host can come close to.

For instance, lately Rush was speaking about the Obama team downsizing the expectations of an Obama presidency. I'm certain you all keep in mind how pundits have been predicting 4 million individuals will be in Washington D.C. for Obama's inauguration. Guess what? Now, they are saying it will be closer to half that amount. Bear in mind how Obama promised us pie-in-the-sky-with-whipped-cream-on-it-but in his campaign? Well, now these expectations are becoming downsized.

Quite a few other Correct-Wingers are speaking about the downsizing, yet Rush has nailed it. He points out Obama is already beginning to create his legacy. If we do not expect as substantially to begin with, Obama's legacy will appear super-sized if he does Far more than we assume he will. If he does not do what is expected, then we won't be disappointed. In Rush's words, America elected "Clark Kent", not "Superman". If we get Superman, very good, yet our expectations are for a Clark Kent. Well mentioned, understandable, and to the point. The one kernel of insight in the chaff of several words.

Twenty million individuals really like Rush, and most of us by now think Colin Powell is a traitor to our conservative ideals.

You want to know one thing scary? I've listened to Rush so substantially, I have begun to feel enjoy him. Kudos, Rush. I enjoy it!

Carolyn J. Fosdick, retired teacher, artist, conservative ghostwriter, and author of I Ride A Wild Horse presently spends her time writing on political problems that are affecting our American way of life. Go to her most recent weblog for some insightful and believed-provoking conservative views and for some options to some difficult political questions.

Write-up Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=Carolyn_Fosdick
http://EzineArticles.com/?Proper-Wing-Conservative-Rush-Limbaugh---20-Million-Strong-and-Growing&id=1834104

Why I Am A Conservative

1st, let us begin with the dictionary definition of conserve: to preserve from becoming damaged, lost or wasted; to save preserve, or maintain. In politics, a conservative is defined as an individual tending to conserve or maintain established traditions or institutions.

These days let us ask a leading question. Is it worthwhile to conserve or be a conservative? George Santayana, Spanish-American poet and teacher of philosophy at Harvard University, wrote in his book Cause in Widespread Sense: "Those who can't bear in mind the past are condemned to repeat it."

I am a youngster of the Excellent Depression - oldest youngster of a mother set adrift in that financial disaster with Three children. 1 week we lived on a peck of dried peas - morning, noon and evening - which my mother, in Excellent humiliation, obtained from the government surplus food depot.

I mention these painful, private memories so that you will realize I am not unmindful of the hardships of poverty and circumstance, or the role of government in mitigating disaster.

I cast my 1st vote for Franklin Delano Roosevelt - believing then, and nonetheless right now - that government has a responsibility to "prime the pump" in Excellent emergencies.

Sadly, when Democrats realized the vote - acquiring energy of free of charge, social services, they would not return to the requirement of person responsibilities. In 1951, while lunching at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., President Truman and his press secretary came in and took stools at the bar subsequent to our table. Right after sandwich and soup, the president turned and mentioned hello to my host. With this we engaged the president in conversation.

That morning, a headline on the front page of the "Washington Article" was -- "Inflation Hits 3 %." None of us in the group had ever heard of inflation. So I mentioned, "Mr. President, excuse my ignorance, but what is inflation?

Mr. Truman smiled and replied, "Do not apologize. I was asked that similar question at the cabinet meeting this morning. I explained it was such as a hunter stung by a bee -- and here he told a locker-room joke, the gist of which was the hunter's wish for a salve that would get rid of the sting but leave the swelling.

I laughed, but I learned he was deliberately pumping up inflation for political acquire - by running the printing presses overtime at the Bureau of Engraving.

Truman already had confiscated the real money in the Social Security Insurance Fund to enable pay for Globe War II, replacing the insurance reserve with I.O.U s. Therefore, the hedge against old age retirement ceased becoming insurance and became a "trust." Some of you may possibly keep in mind the liberal argument: "There is absolutely nothing to be concerned around. We owe it to ourselves."

I became alarmed, due to the fact Widespread sense told me that Social Security, and even the nation, would go bankrupt if inflation - at 1 %, or whatever - continued indefinitely. That's when I became a conservative.

When Social Security approached its 1st brief-fall in the early sixties, I wrote a column warning around the impending crisis. The quantity of angry response by readers, which includes some close buddies who really should have grasped the details, astonished me. I was referred to as irresponsible for suggesting that Social Security was in difficulty.

Regrettably, the Washington politicians fessed up a year later and raised the employee/employer Social Security taxes for the 1st time. Such increases have occurred periodically just about every simply because. A different is necessary these days, as is Medicare and Medicaid.

The important trouble is that operating-and-saving Americans these days ought to cough up to government - federal, state, and local - at least a third of what they earn. I am a student of history, and I have realized that all prior civilizations have collapsed when roughly 40 % of the fruits of producers go to enable non-producers - government functionaries becoming the largest non-productive shoppers.

We are closer to the edge than our politicians including to admit. In our time, the Soviet Union slipped over the edge. The Communist Manifesto - "to each according to want, from each according to ability" - has a Fantastic, compassionate ring. But socialism often has been a nation-killer, and liberalism is absolutely nothing a lot more than slow-motion socialism.

The United States national debt is 5 and 1/2 trillion cash. Interest on this debt takes the top 35 % of federal taxes. Social services that the borrowed cash supplied has been consumed and forgotten.

If we balanced the federal price range subsequent year, and each and every year forever, we would in no way escape the 35 % overburden on our federal revenue devoid of repudiating the debt, or confiscating your and my savings by drastic devaluation of our cash.

Do not laugh! President Nixon did it overnight in a smaller way. Mexico and Russia did it final year major time. Inflation does it additional slowly, but just as certainly. How substantially did you pay for your final residence or car that 20 years ago price 1-fourth as a lot?

We should move on from balancing the spending budget and begin operating earnestly toward decreasing the national debt. It\'s the economy, stupid.

Right after the economy, the principal difficulties plaguing the nation center about the liberal dissipation of established traditions and institutions.

We have destroyed the loved ones and the work ethic with no-questions-asked welfare, encouragement of out-of-wedlock teen-age pregnancies with free of charge condoms in school and welfare Right after delivery that rewards the disappearance of impregnators We have dumbed down education with the hope of keeping youngsters in school - but, nonetheless, the drop-out rate in inner-city schools is 45 % and unemployment of young, black males is 55 %. A lost generation.

Pornography and gutter language is Widespread on prime- time tv. Teen-age drug addiction is soaring. Street violence is commonplace.

liberals laugh at morality, loved ones values, religious faith, hard work, high educational standards, courtesy, patriotism, chaste sexual conduct, person responsibility, pre-marital abstinence, polite language.

To conserve, 1 has to be smart adequate to know what to preserve and maintain from 10,000 years of civilization, so we Do not preserve repeating grievous errors. Our nation, our culture, our civilization depends on conservatism - either to save what is Fantastic and workable, or to rescue us from anarchy when the nation goes belly up.

I close by recommending the "Serenity Prayer" delivered at the height of the Wonderful Depression - by Reinhold Niebuhr, the renowned American clergyman:

"God grant us the courage to alter items we can, accept the issues we can't, and the wisdom to know the distinction."

September 25, 1996

Click here to see this write-up on Lindsey Williams's site

Lindsey Williams is a Sun columnist who can be contacted at:

LinWms@earthlink.net or LinWms@lindseywilliams.org

Web site: http://www.lindseywilliams.org with over a thousand of Lin's Editorial & At Large articles written over 40 years.

Also featured in its entirety is Lin's groundbreaking book "Boldly Onward," that critically analyzes and develops theories around the original Spanish explorers of America. (fully indexed/searchable)

Write-up Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Lindsey_Williams
http://EzineArticles.com/?Why-I-Am-A-Conservative&id=484617

Shock And Confuse

Mark Foley is a name on the lips of numerous these days; mine included. It\'s incredible really. Conservative, Republicans, liberals and Democrats are all appalled. This is the sort of unity that does not take place all that typically on Capitol Hill and from sea to shining sea across the fruited plain. The difficulty is that even though all sides are outraged and united in their outrage, they are outraged for diverse causes.

conservatives are outraged since there is just specific behavior that is unbecoming of our elected officials. Making use of their position of energy as a dating service regardless of the age of their targets or the sexual orientation of the official is reprehensible. You\'re in Washington to do a job, not get some action. Targeting minors and individuals beneath their tutelage basically makes it all the worse.

Republicans are outraged mainly because Mark Foley is a black eye to their party and they nonetheless have sufficient conservative bones in their bodies (for the most part) to at least take offense as your typical conservative would. Plus they know who their "base" is.

Democrats are "outraged" over the Mark Foley affair simply because Republicans have shown that they can clean up their own home though Democrats like William Jefferson (caught red handed taking bribes), Cynthia McKinney (caught red handed battering a cop), Barney Frank (who allowed a prostitution ring to be run out of his workplace) and John Murtha (who took bribes in ABSCAM) usually appear to be allowed to continue on with their service and remain in very good standing with the party. liberals are likewise "outraged" since every single time one thing takes place that they can use to stay away from speaking around what they think (i.e. raising taxes, wage fixing, impeaching Bush, socialized medicine, and so forth) It\'s a excellent issue for them. But at least we're all "outraged". That's a commence.

liberals

Liberal Vs Conservative Religion - Are There Any Good Guys?

These days the word Liberal is usually employed as a pejorative. Heck, I typically use it that way myself. I am a moderate, and possibly invest about 40% of the time cursing the idiocy of the Left and 60% complaining and worrying about the Proper (It is too poor there are not a lot more actual conservative minds in the Conservative camp Nowadays.). Of the Two the conservatives have a tendency to scare me a bit far more Yet the Leftists in complete energy would be just as negative, in their very own way. Yet, the actions of the radicals on either side do not condemn an total school of believed. This must be remembered by pundits on each sides in this age of attack politics.

Lately a radically Conservative group has taken over pretty much all the political voice of conservative American Christianity. They have applied their pulpit to propound, and pound in, their very own view of history and how Christianity has influenced the improvement of the United States as a nation. They are not basically lying about the influence of the churches. The trouble is that they have forgotten from just exactly where in the Church all that influence came. Yes, it was those damn liberals just about every time!

In American history, just about every time the religious culture had a profound positive influence on modifications in society those influences came from Liberal churches, not Conservative ones.

The Conservative Churches in every single case have held the line with the status quo by way of history no matter if it was relating to the Revolution, slavery, youngster labor, workers rights, racial equality or now, gay rights. But these exact same Conservative Churches of these days want to shine their halo with the contributions of the Liberal Churches of the past.

This activity is not distinctive to Christianity by any indicates. A Radical Conservative Jew will invest a lot power telling you about Judaism's incredible contributions to Western society Yet, will not see that his brand of thinking by no means produced any of it. Discover any Conservative Imam and you will Discover a Guy eager to convince you that Islam has been an enormously positive contributor to civilization over the centuries. Yet remind him that his blind Conservative philosophy once more had absolutely nothing to do with those periods of (heretical and liberal) Islamic glory he polishes up for you to admire, and he might take offense.

In both case, when religious and political energy intermingle, progress comes when the Church is Liberal and tolerant, Yet only stagnation and decay when the Church is Conservative. It must be noted that Conservative religious believed can have a fantastic influence on society, Yet that influence appears to be chiefly poor. Witness the defense of slavery and the stances against youngster labor laws and minority civil rights laws taken up by numerous so-known as God following men and women. Witness the attempts at the blind conversion of any peoples of other religions that are below the influence of the politicized religion.

Conservatism is extremely productive at sustaining the wheels of a society turning. There is a correct virtue most instances in keeping most of the status quo. Yet Conservative believed has no track record of becoming ready to grease those wheels or present a inventive inspiration for the folks who are pushing the cart of civilization. It surely does not let flaws in the method to be changed devoid of a battle.

Without having a Liberal element in society, one with adequate of a voice to smack the bosses on the head now and then to moderate their actions, society is absolutely nothing Yet a slave camp destined to fade into the dust of history.

http://guydewhitney.com

Post Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=Guy_DeWhitney
http://EzineArticles.com/?Liberal-Vs-Conservative-Religion---Are-There-Any-Great-Guys?&id=4250732

God Willing? Political Fundamentalism in the White House, the 'War on Terror', and the Echoing Press

David Domke, God Prepared? Political Fundamentalism in the White Home, the 'War on Terror', and the Echoing Press. London and Ann Arbor, Ml: Pluto Press, 2004. 240 pp.

The relationship in between politics and media has constantly been a subject for vast researches. Nonetheless the use of religious discourse in addresses and speeches of politicians to back their policies is not a new concern. But what is performed in this book that makes is outstanding and diverse is an analysis of the interconnections amongst all these Three together. Therefore David Domke's book is ideally positioned to cut appropriate into the heart of debates about the modern day developments at the intersection of religion, politics and media inside the US. According to him, the foreign and domestic foreign developments in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 had been not only (neo) conservative, but also firmly grounded in a (Christian) religious fundamentalism. Domke argues that the Bush administration has turned a religious worldview into political policy and has produced what Domke calls a 'political fundamentalism', defined as 'an intertwining of conservative religious faith, politics, and strategic communication' (p. 6). The book is also a critique of the Bush administration's disregard for democracy in the months right after the attack.

The introductory chapter of God Prepared? identifies 4 primary characteristics of the Bush administration's communication that have been grounded in a conservative religious worldview: (1) a binary idea of reality (apparent in the constant use of Two constructions: great vs. evil and security vs. peril); (2) an obsession with time and demands for instant action against terrorism(manifest in Two beliefs: that action in the here and now is crucial, and that one's commitment to a particular course of action, if perceived to be God inspired, ought to be of an enduring nature); (3) declarations about the will of god for the united states and the values of freedom and liberty; and finally (4) an intolerance for dissent(apparent in the administration's unified voice in public communication, its appeals for other political actors to act with political unity and its harsh criticisms of dissenters). In every of the chapters that follow, one of these characteristics is defined and discussed in detail, with evidence providing its constant presence in the public communications of the president in between 11 September 2001 and 1 could 2003.

In chapter 2 he examines the presence of Two binaries in the president's discourse and news coverage after September 11- very good versus evil and security versus peril- and argues that these conceptions of reality reflected and contributed to a sense of moral certitude amongst the bush administration that was applied to justify limits on civil liberties and main preemptive military action even though also helping to engender public support for the president and administration's "war on terror".

Chapter 3 delivers evidence of time fixations all through the administration's discourse and news coverage, and argues that they allowed the administration simultaneously to push for instant action on certain "war on terrorism" policies and to justify this wish as a requisite step in a extended-term, God- ordained approach. The implication was clear: to not act rapidly or to not endure in the campaign against terrorism was to threat an additional September 11.

In chapter 4 evidence is provided of how the universal gospel of freedom and liberty, provided by the president and echoed by the press, functioned as a central rationale for the administration's foreign policies, especially in justifying the new preemptive doctrine and the Iraq war.

Chapter five focuses on how the administration's emphasis upon political unity and harsh rebukes of those dissented worked together to encourage support for the administration, and to recommend that anybody who held opposing views was unpatriotic and potentially putting individuals in the United States at threat.

Chapter 6 reflects upon the collection of evidence, in Three central sections. Initial, it argues that the Bush administration provides an instructive case study of how political fundamentalism can gain wide support in the United States. The chapter's second section scrutinizes the role of news media in these processes, with the argument that in a nation-difficult context, commercial mass media are drawn to the discourses of political conservatives, especially those that are religiously grounded. The final section of the chapter explores how cultural leaders could craft a moral discourse that counters the predominance of political fundamentalism, and why it is imperative for U.S. citizens and other people that they do so.

Chapter 7 gives conclusions, focusing on implications of the administration's political fundamentalism for democracy, each in the United States and globally.

In the way the writer brings a rigorous analysis of a wide range of empirical material, David Domke's work is of very good value to study. Even so, to what extent his work can contribute to a greater understanding of the relationship in between religion, politics, and the media is a matter of question. Some scholars might uncover it the role of religion has been exaggerated. Some scholars may well question the way he has analyzed meaning formation and reception in media as it is a subjective matter. Even so, the book very properly clarifies how the actions of the Bush administration and the news media are straight counter to fundamental American democratic ideals and principles. It shows how civil religion is utilized to promote its political objectives and to justify self-interest. So "God Prepared" is a should-read for any person who cherishes American democracy, any person who feels uneasy about the Bush Administration's use of religious pictures, as properly as those who have concerns about the way the press assists Bush advance his agenda. Even so, the potential and necessity for additional discussion on the topic exists that can encourage other scholars.

Write-up Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=Nasrin_Dastjerdi
http://EzineArticles.com/?God-Prepared?-Political-Fundamentalism-in-the-White-Home,-the-War-on-Terror,-and-the-Echoing-Press&id=891481