Conservative View On Politics And World Events: 2010

Saturday, December 25, 2010

Conservative Liberal - Why is One a Dirty Word?

The word liberal is utilised in a derogatory manner in quite a few political campaigns. Quite a few instances a candidate can paint a negative image of an opponent just by labeling them a "liberal"

On the other hand, conservative does not have the similar connotation. If a politician attempted to persuade his or her constituents to not vote for their opponent, labeling them "conservative" the opponent would additional than probably embrace that label.

Becoming in New York City, I in no way believed liberal was a dirty word, a word that you do not want to be linked with. In comparing the definitions of the Two words, I consider I am justified in feeling that way.

Note that I am speaking around the use of the word liberal or conservative when it comes to social problems.

Let's appear up the definition of liberal and conservative and see what we get.

Conservative initial.

I searched for "define conservative" and "definition conservative" in Google.

I got back some outcomes such as "having social or political views favoring conservatism" and "a member of a Conservative Party".

While that's fine, I was only interested in the definitions of the word. I knew conservative or liberal are each methods to lean politically.

Other outcomes did define the word, such as:

* Favoring conventional views and values; tending to oppose alter.
* One favoring conventional views and values.
* Conventional or restrained in style
* tending or disposed to preserve current views, conditions, or institutions

This tells a lot. Conservative, specifically in a social sense, is around sustaining the status quo. conservatives do not like alter.

Nowadays, it\'s time to appear up the word "Liberal."

* broad: displaying or characterized by broad-mindedness;
* having political or social views favoring reform and progress
* tolerant of alter; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition

OK, so there is the contrasting side of conservative.

Consider around this. If a buddy or a person you respect could describe you with either definition, which would you rather have mentioned around you?

That you are broad minded or narrow minded?
That you do not like alter or that you are tolerant of alter?
That you favor progress or you don\'t favor progress?
That you favor institutions or you are not bound by the past?

Alter is beneficial. Progress has given us points like - information that earth goes about the sun, undertaking away with burning people today at the stake, modern day science, electrical energy, airplanes, computers, the suitable of ladies to vote, and the abolishment of slavery.

Tradition is excellent too, but not when it stops progress or hurts a different person or interferes with their liberties or proper to pursue happiness.

If you just take the final 100 years or so, the conservative has been on the incorrect side of history. As an instance, you don\'t assume the Dixiecrats had been liberal do you?

When George Wallace, was campaigning to maintain racial segregation, was he running as a liberal or a conservative?

And when groups of folks band together to uphold items like "standard values" and "household values" and they endorse and promote policies that are based on exclusion instead of inclusion this is harmful for freedom and humanity.

conservatives will say items like "folks who oppose their conservative values hate America and oppose every thing that produced us beneficial." The precise opposite is accurate. If you don\'t strive to continuously make it far better and embrace progress then you remain in the past and stop understanding which is a thing that must in no way be accomplished.

For these causes the word Liberal ought to be worn as a badge of honor. An individual searching for a superior tomorrow thinking our ideal days are ahead of us, rather than clinging to yesterday mainly because that's much easier to do.

If you liked this post or want to read other people like it, I advocate going to http://www.dailyepost.com for additional posts and articles around political and social problems of these days.

Write-up Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=Ethan_Semmel
http://EzineArticles.com/?Conservative-Liberal---Why-is-One-a-Dirty-Word?&id=4351425

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Commonsense Solutions - Commonsense Conservative Views

In numerous methods, we appear to have lost our way in the globe. So numerous of our issues had been foreseen, that the directions in which we are headed appear so backwards it is tough to know how we got here. Some conservative views to ponder:

Oil - Because the Presidency of Jimmy Carter, we have as a country worried about our dependency on foreign oil. Each parties have promised options, and Each have failed us. We sit on large oil reserves that would present desperately necessary jobs for unemployed Americans, and deprive the men and women who hate us of our petrodollars. But we continue to make it tougher and tougher to create our very own oil, and invest millions of taxpayer dollars on unproven green technologies. Does this make sense?

Healthcare - The International Monetary Fund warned the country of Greece that they ought to get out of the healthcare organization in order to rescue their country from bankruptcy. Our neighbor to the north, Canada, has attempted universal healthcare with disastrous outcomes for their country and the health of its men and women. Massachusetts has seen healthcare fees soar out of sight making use of the very same healthcare proposals that have been passed into law by the Obama administration. And do I ought to remind you of what TennCare has carried out to our state spending budget? In poll following poll the American folks have expressed their dissatisfaction with the new healthcare strategy, But it looms over us, slowly becoming implemented. Why?

Our Border - Because the administration of Ronald Reagan, the American folks have asked for a secure border. Because 9/11, it has clearly been an issue of national security, and our Constitution demands it! But the borders stay open, and the American taxpayer spends million and billions of dollars offering healthcare, prison space, education facilities (and on and on) for the illegals amongst us. Now as a outcome of our inattention to this issue, we see a raging drug war that is spilling over the border into American towns and cities. Why wasn't some thing performed lengthy ago, and why are we nonetheless performing absolutely nothing?

The Deficit - For years, politicians have worried about our national debt, and promised to rein in spending. But with a national debt approaching 13 TRILLION, every single week we witness some new government plan, financed with borrowed dollars launched to develop the government. President Obama decries the no cost spending methods of George Bush, But his 1st price range was practically Three instances the highest spending of the Bush years. When nearly 50 cents of each dollar is borrowed, why are we spending so considerably?

How tough would it be to drop the barriers to creating our personal oil reserves, enable health insurance organizations to compete for our enterprise all across the country, secure the border, and cease spending cash we don\'t have? We could do all those issues if we only had politicians with conservative views that would listen to us. It isn't that these issues are insurmountable. It is that effective influences in Washington DC have a vested interest in keeping items the way they are...and they use our cash to offer those fantastic TV commercials to make us believe they care...

I, in my commonsense conservative views, feel it is time we voted for the citizen legislator instead of the eggheads from Harvard and Yale with no expertise, only academic theories. We will need people today who know how to solve issues, not raise cash from unique interests, regardless of whether those interest are unions or companies. We want situation solvers from everyday walks of life, and not the identical old political households with their cautiously groomed heirs to their hereditary offices. We stand at a crossroads that will establish the future of our country. We have far more details at our fingertips than any generation just before us ever had. If it is correct that we get the politicians we deserve, I would phrase it a small differently. What do the future generations, our youngsters and grandchildren deserve? It is now their future we are mortgaging. Decide on wisely when you vote. THEIR future depends on it!

DSHolman is an entrepreneur and loved ones man involved in politics locally and all through the nation. He holds to his conservative views and has an avid interest in the conservative news.

Post Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Donald_Holman
http://EzineArticles.com/?Commonsense-Options---Commonsense-Conservative-Views&id=5258489

Monday, December 13, 2010

What Is Political Liberalism Versus Political Conservatism?

Several folks, as nicely as Quite a few political elected officials, usually refer to themselves as either a liberal or a conservative. Nonetheless, what does that actually imply?

Objectively, One would frequently feel that a conservative was an individual who believed in "smaller government," balanced budgets, and fewer social services, whilst a liberal could be perceived as a person who believed in a lot more government involvement, additional social programs, and bigger spending. On the other hand, in the actual globe, the lines in between conservative and liberal are rather generally blurred.

Most people today would have deemed President Bill Clinton to be a lot more liberal that President George Bush. Nonetheless, when Clinton left workplace, there was a surplus budget, and the stock marketplace was carrying out fairly properly, and unemployment was really low, though enterprise earnings had been frequently carrying out nicely. Eight years later, President George Bush left workplace with record federal deficits, a down stock marketplace, a weakening economy and high unemployment figures. Government spending throughout the Bush administration grew at a far higher pace than in the course of the Clinton years.

Substantially has been written and mentioned about the Bush tax cuts, and whilst it absolutely meant lower federal profits taxes, it also absolutely brought in less federal earnings, therefore exacerbating the deficit. In addition, these tax breaks on federal earnings tax usually induced other municipalities to raise their taxes.

How Several instances have you heard a political candidate complaining about One form of taxes - - often, genuine estate taxes? Nevertheless, in a massive amount of situations, this lowered actual estate tax ended up becoming much more than offset by other taxes and fees that municipalities imposed.

When will the American public demand a lot more from its elected officials? When will folks cease reacting to rhetoric and terminology, and examine reality and action instead? Why do individuals call themselves liberal or conservative, and therefore button hole themselves into some artificial label, with definitely rather small accurate meaning. Why do folks vote strictly by party line, as opposed to evaluating every single concern on its merits?

There are fairly couple of officials that are strictly conservative, or strictly liberal on every single concern. Men and women need to fully grasp that it is probable for somebody to be liberal on social problems, although becoming conservative on financial problems, or vice versa. We have a tendency to label our politicians, our politics, and our problems in too Significantly of a black and white matter, whilst there is frequently Numerous gray areas. We deserve greater than our existing method is delivering.

Richard Brody has over 30 years consultative sales, advertising and marketing, training, managerial, and operations knowledge. He has trained sales and advertising and marketing men and women in Several industries, given hundreds of seminars, appeared as a enterprise spokesperson on over 200 radio and tv programs, and often blogs on actual estate, politics, economics, management, leadership, negotiations, conferences and conventions, and so on. Richard has negotiated, arranged and/ or organized hundreds of conferences and conventions. Richard is a Senior Consultant with RGB Consultation Services, an Ecobroker, a Licensed Buyers Agent (LBA) and Licensed Salesperson in NYS, in actual estate.
Richard Brody has owned companies, been a Chief Operating Officer, a Chief Executive Officer, and a Director of Improvement, as nicely as a consultant. Richard has a Consulting Site http://tinyurl.com/rgbcons; a blog http://tinyurl.com/rgbstake; and can be followed on Twitter.

Write-up Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=Richard_Brody
http://EzineArticles.com/?What-Is-Political-Liberalism-Versus-Political-Conservatism?&id=5305060

Monday, December 6, 2010

Sean Hannity's "Conservative Victory"

Sean Hannity delivers an additional explosive book about the dangers of liberalism and the require of Conservative Victory. He goes into fantastic detail about the danger Obama's pals, programs and relationships pose for those who think in freedom and smaller government.

His initial chapter goes into Obama's history and how he was raised. He was raised up by his mother and Grandparents who had numerous Marxist views. These views shaped him into what he is these days and ready him for his life in liberal politics.

Sean goes into fantastic detail about the radical pals and associations that he either had or has today in the course of his political profession. The book goes into wonderful detail about how these buddies have influenced his behavior as a Senator and President of the United States.

Sean also goes into detail about his socialist views and policies. These policies have created the nation weaker and emboldened our enemies as time progresses. These policies have failed the American Men and women as they have created him and his buddies richer. These funds are carried on the backs of the American Tax payer and the future tax payers not but with us.

His appeasement mentality has exposed him for who is genuinely is. President Obama is a coward who would trie to appease those who hate us even though shunning those who would ally with us. This has created for a weak America and risky globe.

Sean also expresses his views as a "Reagan Conservative." It shows up in the course of the book and he devotes an total chapter in the book. He believes this variety of conservatism which entails a smaller government, far more freedoms and person responsibility will bring this nation back to its prosperous approaches. He also goes into detail about a new "Contract with America" that would hold those in workplace accountable to the Men and women they represent. It would also lessen the the influence the government would have in the lives of the American People today.

Sean Hannity goes into excellent detail about how the Republican party had lost its way. The outcome was the loss of the majorities that they carried in each houses of Congress. It goes into detail on what the Republicans ought to do to win the heart of the conservative base and to take back the House and Senate.

For Wonderful Political Book critiques please check out http://www.politicalbookreview.com

Write-up Supply: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=Thomas_Oen
http://EzineArticles.com/?Sean-Hannitys-Conservative-Victory&id=4192032

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

A Third Conservative Awakening

The 1st Conservative Awakening - The Reagan Revolution

In the past 30 years we have witnessed Three conservative revolutions. The Very first of these awakenings was recognized as the Reagan Revolution, birthed in the election year of 1980, as a outcome of Democratic President Jimmy Carter's inability to inspire, make difficult choices and lead a nation to financial prosperity. I personally recall this time properly given that I was in High School all through all 4 years of Carter's term. I bought my 1st car my sophomore year, and keep in mind waiting in the extended gas lines, which stretched out into the streets. These 4 years will be remembered as a time of high inflation, unemployment and an oil-power crises. Yet another essential thing was Iran, One of our enemies at the time, who had taken several Americans hostage, and paraded them on camera for an American viewing audience to see. These themes and other people permeated the news every evening and demoralized the American public. As a outcome Ronald W. Reagan was ushered into workplace as our 40th President. For the Initial time in my life I heard a conservative agenda articulated and embraced by millions of Americans. Reagan's Initial Two years exactly where tough as his tax cuts took a period of time to take hold and influence the economy. The American men and women grew impatient, till the dead economy below Carter's policy directives suddenly shifted, birthing financial prosperity from top to bottom. America walked tall and proud as soon as once again.

The Second Conservative Awakening - The "Contract with America"

The second revolution was identified as a conservative revolt led by Newt Gingrich, a conservative congressman from the state of Georgia, who read and responded to a deep seated public dissatisfaction deriving from President Bill Clinton's unpopular tax increases suitable right after taking workplace, along with talks of overhauling the American healthcare method. Newt Gingrich, along with a handful of conservatives, led a campaign recognized as the Contract with America. This contract listed ten legislative priorities, which would be presented and passed in the Home of Representatives if the American individuals elected a conservative majority in Congress. This contract gave the American folks some thing to think in and strive for right after a disappointing loss in 1992. So in November, throughout the 1994 mid-term elections, Republicans gained 54 Home seats taking firm control of the Home of Representatives for the Initial time because 1954. Newt Gingrich became the 1st Republican Speaker given that a generation. President Clinton read the writing on the wall and decided to govern from the political center. This move to the center re-elected Clinton for One more 4-year term, and America skilled prosperity as soon as once again as a center-suitable nation.

The Third Conservative Awakening - The Men and women's Revolution

The 2010 mid-term elections revealed a third conservative awakening. I call this One the Folks's Revolution. The proponents of this good political awakening became recognized as the Tea Party, self-empowered citizens who unashamedly think in:
- Tiny, smarter and more accountable government,
- Supplying for a powerful defense,
- Fiscal responsibility; the elimination of wasteful programs, a balanced price range, and lowering the national debt.
- Citizen and smaller business enterprise empowerment, rather than governmental empowerment,
- And confirmed capitalist principles, which empower tiny organization owners, lower unemployment, and promote prosperity for all citizens.

The effect and energy of the Tea Party had repercussions across the board; winning a record majority 61+ (some races are nonetheless becoming counted) seats in the Home, adding 6 more seats in the Senate (Two are nonetheless below dispute) closing the massive gap gained by Democrats in the 2008 elections. Republicans also won an overwhelming quantity of governorships across America, which will be crucial when state houses draw the congressional lines for the subsequent decade. Yes, the electoral map gradually added the color "red" all through the evening as outcomes poured into media outlets. The Tea Party endorsed 112 candidates for the U.S. Home of Representatives winning only a third of this amount (36); a excellent displaying for an emerging motion. On a state level, calculations reveal a GOP revolution adore no other in political history picking up over 680 State Senate and Home seats nationwide; a lot of close races are nonetheless becoming resolved a couple of days right after the election. Some estimate this historic figure can go over 700. The Tea Party inspired and awoke the center-appropriate sleeping giant, the American men and women, as soon as once again. In a press conference the day right after the election President Obama dubbed this political defeat as a "shellacking", a great way of saying, "They beat our ass."

Forty % of American voters identify themselves with the Tea Party motion and values. And eight out of ten of these citizens voted for Republicans (CBS news; November 3, 2010), I suppose to restore sanity and conservative principles back into governance. A latest study revealed the Tea Party is commonly created up of older, white, Christian folk, yes, those who like carrying their Bibles and guns; sounds love the folks who began this entire "freedom" thing in the Very first place.

The question remains, what will occur with the Tea Party? Are they a seasonal motion responding merely to a far left leaning agenda?

Joel Garcia
Latino Townhall
President and Founder

Latino Townhall exists to empower Latinos via education, leadership improvement and civic engagement to permeate, impact and transform the 7 Communities of Culture. The 7 Communities of Culture contain Arts & Entertainment, Company & Commerce, Education, the Faith Community, the Family, Government & Law and the Media. Those occupying positions of leadership in these 7 Communities of Culture tend to impact, effect and shape our culture in positive or negative ways. It is our desire to develop all around leaders with the upmost character, integrity and leadership competencies capable of permeating and transforming culture.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joel_Garcia
http://EzineArticles.com/?A-Third-Conservative-Awakening&id=5327443

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Conservative Vs Progressive Governments

In a current interview, Thomas Sowell, an American economist and author and Senior Fellow at Hoover Institute, who turned 80 this year discussed his new book and suggestions in an interview. In his new book, Dismantling America: and other controversial essays. and in the interview he lays out his philosophy of government, which is the Conservative position of laissez-faire (significantly much less regulation) of financial activity and of government intervention of social values.

I've often admired Professor Sowell and have enjoyed numerous of his books, especially in the region of economics and his understanding of absolutely free trade which is based on no cost association and exchange. But as a 'former' Conservative for over 30 yrs I've come to the realization that the major distinction in between Progressives and conservatives is what they want the federal government to regulate. Pros want to regulate financial activity to create social outcomes of collective equality, justice and peace, though Cons favor to leave financial activity to a freer and much less regulated model but on the other hand favor to intervene into societal values with federal powers. My assertion is that social values and financial values work in tandem and responsd to open markets in equivalent approaches, and that to have a wholesome economy and 'values' wealthy society is to have significantly much less regulations and additional freedom of association and transaction.

The framers of our constitution in truth grappled with this and in their brilliance came up with a divided government that enumerate precise powers of the federal government which had been 'negative' concerning liberty and left all else to the States which may well be either 'negative' or 'positive' liberty, but warned against the latter. Negative Liberty is like Adam's relationship with God in the garden, "All else you are totally free to do, but remain away from this tree" vs God's relationship with the Israelites via Mosaic Law, "these 613 laws you Need to carry out to qualify". JS Mill place Negative Liberty this way in his Harm Principle, "That the only objective for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to stop harm to other people. " As Jefferson stated, "The very best government is the One that governs least." Doesn\'t it make sense that if you or I can barely (a least we feel) regulate our personal houses, then why would we consider far more power in Washington, DC would permit for superior regulatory outcomes.

Also, with the exceptional personalities, talents and physical demands from house to house, wouldn't it make sense that how you govern successfully may well be unique than how I would in my house? Managing from 30,000 feet is considerably much less helpful and may be dangerous and counter productive versus managing close and on the ground. The framers understood this, and looked to a number of sources and historical events to conclude that 'macro government' Need to be negative in its application of law (like the garden) but that States and their local precincts may possibly experiment in positive liberty. So problems like marriage, drugs, land rights, banking, and so forth, they left to the States to make a decision. The essence of the Constitution was to limit power and maximize liberty, but to let the Federal Government to step in when those liberties have been violated, the powers left to the States depending upon each and every State's Charter or Constitution allowed for them to 'dabble' in positive liberty to regulate particular values - but forewarned them to proceed at their very own peril.

Christopher M. Mahon
http://www.ambidextrouscivicdiscourse.com

The Ambidextrous Civic Discourse web site is a put exactly where you can locate data about financial, philosophical and political problems that challenge those on the 'right' or the 'left'. Here you can uncover classics on the subjects said above that contrast differences like Keynesian vs Classical Economics or the function of government - Negative vs Positive Rights. You\'ll also be in a position to gain a far better understanding of the Two huge political parties and the progressive and conservative movements. We also have a study plan, ACD Studies that enables for open discussion on it\'s weblog to read and exchange suggestions with other members. We hope you enjoy our internet site and invite input on how we can increase it.

Write-up Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?professional=Christopher_Mahon
http://EzineArticles.com/?Conservative-Vs-Progressive-Governments&id=5331111

Does the Media Have a Conservative Or Liberal Bias?

It's a simple fact of life that all people and all human endeavors (including news coverage) are biased. conservatives (often identified with Republicans in the United States, although they are not strictly the same) like to accuse the mainstream media of exhibiting "liberal bias", and at the same time, liberals (again, in the U.S., often identified with the Democratic party) accuse the media of conservative bias. Because bias is widespread in virtually all news sources, it's very easy for conservatives to come up with examples of egregious liberal bias in the media...just as liberals find it easy to point to examples of blatant conservative bias. But these examples, picked and chosen to support one particular viewpoint, do not do anything to establish whether or not there's an overall trend or pattern of bias in one direction or another.

It's Not As Simple As Liberal vs. Conservative:

Compounding the problem of assessing what type of bias exists in the media are viewpoints that don't fit strictly into the liberal-conservative box. Certain news outlets exhibit a libertarian slant, taking socially liberal stances (such as pro-legalization and pro-gay-rights) while allying with conservatives in supporting the free market and smaller government. Some publications may have an environmentally alarmist bias, or a particular regional or cultural bias to them. Foreign sources exhibit bias associated with a particular country's viewpoint, perspective, or vested interests, and these foreign news sources can rarely be projected cleanly onto the American political spectrum defined by Democrats and Republicans.

So what is the bias? Liberal or Conservative?

My answer, which is not what many people want to hear, is that the question of whether the media collectively exhibits liberal bias or conservative bias is not a useful question, because it has no meaningful answer. Bias is widespread, but it is also complex and cannot be accurately described with labels like liberal or conservative.

So if we can't identify the bias of the media as a whole, what can we do?

While it's impossible to generalize about the bias of the media as a whole, often, a lot can be said about the biases of one particular media outlet. These biases are thoroughly discussed in print editorials and opinion pieces, and of course on blogs and internet discussion sites. By reading news with a critical eye, you can begin to identify the bias inherent in one particular news source's perspective. I find that bias is able to more easily sort out in print sources than on television or radio broadcasts, where bias is often hidden by the charisma and speaking abilities of a news anchor or talk show host.

When reading newspapers and print sources, one useful technique for this purpose is to read the same story in several different sources, and compare the conclusions drawn. It is especially valuable to seek out perspectives from other countries and cultures, as these viewpoints can sometimes offer valuable insights that are rarely found in domestic sources.

Alex Zorach writes for a variety of different websites; his opinion website is http://cazort.net/

On this site, you can find discussion of unbiased news sources, which includes a listing a number of high-quality online news sources, and discussion of what sorts of bias each of these sources exhibits, enabling you to approach a more objective, less biased viewpoint by exposing yourself to different perspectives.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Alex_Zorach
http://EzineArticles.com/?Does-the-Media-Have-a-Conservative-Or-Liberal-Bias?&id=5347366